Warning: trigger possible! This article will talk about male physiology, heterosex is also mentioned.


Well, I think it's time to talk about the potential taming tools for women to subdue male creatures.
Women can often be heard complaining: "We have no real, natural means of controlling men, we can do nothing against them - we are weaker, and they have a physiological advantage that allows them to exploit women - and what can we do?! Probably the only thing that will help us is genetic engineering..."

Men have created around themselves the image of an invulnerable superman, a kind of "top of the food chain" and have tried very hard to corrupt the female psyche, to erase the understanding of women's own subjectivity. Due to chronic traumatization, most women are under the paralyzing effect of male propaganda and are very afraid of men. The very idea of tipping the scales in their favor - somehow physically disarming men and thereby subjugating them - seems unbelievable to women.
What, purely hypothetically, could women do to restrict men? Is it only "supertechnology" that can help us? The answer is simpler than it seems: women could castrate men when they are born (as children).

This article, of course, is not a call to immediate action, so please do not rush to indignant questions "how can we do it?", "who will let us do this?!" and other hasty negative reactions. This article is primarily information for women to think about or, more likely, information to realize. Basically, what I'm writing about in this article is something women often suggest in the comment sections of fem-communities, and those who have never talked about it have probably thought about it anyway.

Let's talk about how we could put men in their place. I am not going to delve into the question of whether women need men at all and what society would look like with more power in the hands of women. Even if women decide to get rid of men, it still won't happen immediately. I will also not talk about any alternative, not yet invented methods of reproduction, artificial uterus, etc., so as not to overload the already big article with additional meanings and not to divert the focus of attention from the main topic - the potential disarming and taming of men by women in the most realistic way possible, i.e. without the "miracles" of genetic engineering. Therefore, I simplify the article: suppose men are born, and their biomaterial is still a tool for reproduction.
However, in this same article, I think it's appropriate to briefly outline the situation once again - what, in fact, we should oppose - so that the problem we are fighting and the proposed solution look like a complete picture.
Women need to regain (and retain) reproductive control, which means taking that control away from men and preventing them from taking it back. Men, first of all, must be deprived of subjectivity in the matter of sex and reproduction, deprived of access to women's bodies.
Men in patriarchy have turned sex (namely PIV - penis in vagina) into a way of intimidating and establishing sexual hierarchy, and their sexual organ into an attribute of "lord".
PIV is the main way of asserting male power - it is both ritual humiliation of a woman and the possibility of reproductive violence, i.e. violent transfer by a man of his biomaterial to a woman. The male, through PIV, enforces and maintains the status of "sexual individual" - the owner of sexual property and the subject of reproduction, while taking this subjectivity away from the woman.

The reproductive politics of patriarchy go completely against women's interests, women's understanding of parenthood, and women's physiology itself.
PIV is not a necessity for women either for sexual pleasure or even for conception itself. This sexual practice carries risks of infection, trauma, and most importantly, unplanned pregnancy (pregnancy at a man's will).
For women, sexual satisfaction and reproductive capacity are physiologically unrelated. The clitoris is responsible for sexual pleasure, so sex can be a safe way for a woman to relax, while reproduction is a separate, conscious, well-thought-out step, a personal decision of a woman. And sexual contact with a man is not necessary for the realization of this decision.
To get pregnant, a woman only needs to use donor sperm on a suitable day of the cycle. Among the "artificial" ways of conception, this is called intravaginal insemination. All that is needed is the donor material and the woman's intention to use it.
Conception and pregnancy in this way can become solely a woman's initiative, a woman's conscious action, and no longer associated with PIV. The man as "person" and "parent" with all his "active and dominant" role evaporates from this process completely. He is reduced to a sperm donor.
But how to make a man a sperm donor, blocking at the same time the possibility of his sexual aggression?
I think it would be useful to provide a little information about what the male reproductive system is.
The male "reproductive" system is a set of organs of the genital system. It produces sex cells, as well as sex hormones responsible for the formation and functioning of the body according to the male type. Combined with the urinary system, it forms the genitourinary system.
The male genitals are divided into internal and external organs. The internal ones include sex glands - testicles with their appendages, which develop sperm and produce the sex hormone testosterone, ejaculatory ducts, seminal vesicles, prostate, bulbourethral glands. The external sex organs include the scrotum, which contains the testicles, and the penis, within which runs the urethra, which serves to expel both urine from the bladder and seminal fluid from the ejaculatory ducts.

On average, boys reach potential fertility by age 13 and full fertility by age 14-16.
The genitals that men are so proud of and have turned into a tool of intimidation are actually hanging outside the body. One way to bring men under control and prevent them from harming and threatening women is castration, which can be of different types.
For example, penectomy is the complete or partial removal of the penis (the testicles remain).
This type of intervention does not change a man's hormonal metabolism (as in the case of testicular removal) - the man remains a normal man, but without a penis. As an option, this operation could be carried out in childhood, and after puberty this man could be used to obtain sperm. His ability to experience sexual arousal is preserved, and ejaculation remains possible (men who have undergone penectomy write about this), but sexual contact is no longer possible. That is, it is extremely difficult for such a man to commit rape with his penis.
Without the penis, the scrotum becomes even more vulnerable, as it is deprived of the protection that the penis provides if it is placed on top of it. Urination also becomes possible only while sitting down.
The possible complications and consequences depend on how short the penis has been shortened.

The complete removal of the penis can lead to urinary incontinence and make it more difficult to collect ejaculate. But if you leave a small outgrowth of the penis about two centimeters - it may be quite enough to collect biomaterial in case of need.
It would be useful to mention the methods of collecting semen. Usually it's extracted by masturbation. If this method is impossible, then the so-called electroejaculation is used - the impact of electrical impulses on certain areas through the rectum.
Ejaculation can also be achieved by ordinary massage of the prostate and testicles.
The second method that may be worthy of mention is orchiectomy, which is the removal of the testicles themselves. The surgery is one of the most uncomplicated from the surgical point of view.

Without the testicles, a man usually loses his libido completely, becomes incapable of sexual relations and unfertile. These consequences are irreversible. That is, for the production of sperm after the removal of testicles, he will no longer be suitable.
If there is a need for male biomaterial, then this version of castration should be carried out no earlier than puberty. That is, to take sperm for reproductive purposes when he reaches 13-14 years of age, and after that to castrate.
This surgery has a direct effect on the hormonal background, which affects the behavior, body and health of the boy (man), because the testicles produce most of the male sex hormones. Endocrine and other disorders are possible.
The extent of the consequences for the body depends on the age at which the surgery was performed. The earlier it is performed, the more likely there will be a decrease in muscle and bone mass. There is also a high probability that such castration will make male less impulsive.
There are other types of castration/sterilization. Those mentioned above can be combined. All this, of course, does not cancel the need for other measures against men.
After reading the above, I suppose there are plenty of questions and mixed feelings.
How can such things be practiced at all!
Wouldn't we be like our enemies by doing this?
Does it even make sense to bother so much with traitor sons? And so on.
Let’s think together and discuss these questions and all their contradictions.
I personally believe that there are no ways that are too cruel to suppress men. If men didn't do what they've been doing for several thousand years, no woman would ever think of taking up castration or eliminating them at all. We initially gave them a chance to live freely and be human beings, and we have gotten what we deserved for our naivety. Shortening boys' organs is not a big price to pay for women's safety, and it is a tiny price to pay for all the suffering men have caused women. It is time for women to make a choice: either we continue to pity and love men, or we choose ourselves.
Castration seems a potential way to restrain our enemies. Theoretically, we could do it to them, thus ending male violence.
Just because women have not historically, on a systemic level, taken some kind of violent action against men doesn't mean it's not possible. Men also didn't immediately decide to kidnap, rape, and keep women locked up for their own benefit and then call it "traditional marriage."
Women create men. Before becoming an adult, any man is always in the hands of a woman, and his body and life belong to her. Women have the right to punish and restrict men for all the disasters they have caused.


written by Male Death
Translation by Lia Kas